<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law without ethics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polemarchus.net/2010/02/law-without-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polemarchus.net/2010/02/law-without-ethics/</link>
	<description>A blog about political science and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven andresen</title>
		<link>http://polemarchus.net/2010/02/law-without-ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>steven andresen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polemarchus.net/?p=481#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>I  agree with the claim, here made by professor Graver, that in a storm we cannot rely on law and judgement, but rather, we have only justice and the willingness to confront unjust laws and judgements. And this, in the face of the state&#039;s having laws and judgements on its side.

I would say the SCOTUS&#039;s unwillingness to rule on the constitutionality of the Viet Nam war, for example, arguing that it was a political question instead of a question of constitutional law, is a prime example in support of the professor&#039;s point.

These days, it is the &quot;rule of law&quot; which seems to be the issue which law and judgement fails to protect us. I&#039;m talking here how law and the judgement of the legal profession is tempted to throw rights and protections the people have had since the Magna Carta  under the bus.

At this point, it is only our willingness to fight for justice against the law that protects us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  agree with the claim, here made by professor Graver, that in a storm we cannot rely on law and judgement, but rather, we have only justice and the willingness to confront unjust laws and judgements. And this, in the face of the state&#8217;s having laws and judgements on its side.</p>
<p>I would say the SCOTUS&#8217;s unwillingness to rule on the constitutionality of the Viet Nam war, for example, arguing that it was a political question instead of a question of constitutional law, is a prime example in support of the professor&#8217;s point.</p>
<p>These days, it is the &#8220;rule of law&#8221; which seems to be the issue which law and judgement fails to protect us. I&#8217;m talking here how law and the judgement of the legal profession is tempted to throw rights and protections the people have had since the Magna Carta  under the bus.</p>
<p>At this point, it is only our willingness to fight for justice against the law that protects us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
