<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nachspiel at Polemarchus&#039; &#187; Freakonomics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polemarchus.net/tag/freakonomics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polemarchus.net</link>
	<description>A political science blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No Hawthorne effect at Hawthorne?</title>
		<link>http://polemarchus.net/2009/06/09/no-hawthorne-effect-at-hawthorne/</link>
		<comments>http://polemarchus.net/2009/06/09/no-hawthorne-effect-at-hawthorne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sverre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Methods in political science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freakonomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawthorne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polemarchus.net/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is nothing holy? Must I throw out my introduction textbook in methods now?  The guys over at the Freakonomics blog have dug up and reexamined the original Hawthorne data and concluded that there actually was no Hawthorne effect in the original Hawthorne study! I&#8217;m disappointed right to the very core of my post-graduate student soul. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is nothing holy? Must I throw out my introduction textbook in methods now?  <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/09/was-there-really-a-hawthorne-effect-in-the-original-hawthorne-studies/">The guys over at the Freakonomics blog have dug up and reexamined the original Hawthorne data</a> and concluded that there actually was no <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect">Hawthorne effect</a> in the original Hawthorne study! I&#8217;m disappointed right to the very core of my post-graduate student soul. What should i believe in now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://polemarchus.net/2009/06/09/no-hawthorne-effect-at-hawthorne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

